The Historical Rate of Return for the Stock Market Since 1900

Posted on by Thomas DeGrace

Historical rate of return
The Historical Rate of Return for the major indexes is an important part of stock market history.  The rate of historical returns needs to include dividend distributions in order to get an accurate measure of the total return one would have gotten from investing in the stock market.

During the 20th century, the stock market returned an average of 10.4% a year.  Just $1,000 invested in 1900 would be worth over $19.8 million by the end of 1999.  At 15% average return per year, it only takes 30 years to turn $15,000 to $1 million.

Stock Market History of Returns

Decade Average Return Per year
1900s 9.96%
1910s 4.20%
1920s 14.95%
1930s -0.63%
1940s 8.72%
1950s 19.28%
1960s 7.78%
1970s 5.82%
1980s 17.57%
1990s 18.17%
2000s 1.07%
2010-2013 16.74%

 

How the Historical Rate of Return of the Stock Market is Calculated

Over the stock market history, corporate earnings have gone up an average of 7% per year and the inflation history of the markets shows that inflation has averaged around 4% per year.

The % weights of sectors have changed a lot from 1900 to 2000.  For example, back in 1900, railroads made up over 60% of the stock market yet makeup only .2% today.  More than 60% of American’s lived in rural areas in 1900 and by 1990 that number had dropped to less than 25% according to the U.S. census.

What we have done is compiled data that shows the price change and dividend distribution to come up with the total market return.

For other uses, see how the historical rate of return varies greatly based on stock market historical events

21 Responses to The Historical Rate of Return for the Stock Market Since 1900

  1. Ayush Gupta says:

    OMG! This is really big amount. I wish I would have invested 1000$ in 1900 and would get $19.8 million by the end of 1999.

  2. John says:

    oh these conversion rates are very good. I hope there rate come again this 2012 lol

  3. Chris says:

    Oh! Avg. returning rate in 1990s is quite impressive

    • Brian Henry says:

      The small print down the page a bit… 7% average – minus 4% inflation – how is that impressive? Adding in Dividends etc is nonsense… basically drinking your own cool aide. The real rate of return is 3 to 3.5%

    • David C. Griffith says:

      dont forget that inflation reached 13% in 1980 biasing the average returns

    • Bill Moses says:

      Once upon a time you could buy virtually any mutual fund and expect a fifty percent, and better annual return! Think Clinton era.

  4. Charles says:

    There is an important investing lesson involved here. Investing is more about patience and discipline than timing.

  5. SAJJAD says:

    could someone be so kind that help me how to calculate market rate of return?

  6. Ester says:

    If I had 250,000 cash in 2004. What would be the best strategy for highest return? invest in stock market or real estate?

    • David Rogers says:

      Bitcoin was $0.01 in May of 2010 so $250k would have gotten you 25 million bitcoin. Now at $15k each that would be worth $375 BILLION DOLLARS!!

    • Notamillionaire says:

      Because of leverage the real estate market would have been better. Especially in hots markets like the SF Bay Area. I didn’t do this but wish I had. The real estate market is less volatile. Might go flat or dip a little. But it doesn’t tank 50% as stocks did in 2000 and 2008.

  7. Asghar Butt says:

    There is a cyclic pattern observed having analysed the whole data over a century. A decade of growth and above normal returns is followed by a decade of recession and average or below average payback. Looks like 2010-2020 will also deliver superior returns…

  8. Anna Rodgers says:

    I don’t understand how to make money from the stock market.

    • R. COLEMAN says:

      TALK WITH AN INVESTMENT PROFESSIONAL. HE CAN ADVISE YOU ON OPENING AN ACCOUNT THAT MATCHES YOUR GOALS. I WOULD SUGGEST AN INDEX FUND FOR THOSE WITH LIMITED KNOWLEDGE OF THE MARKET. INVESTING IN INDIVIDUAL STOCKS IS A MIGHTY RISKY BUISNESS. THERE ARE SOME GOOD MUTUAL FUNDS BUT YOU REALLY NEED PROFESSIONAL HELP HERE, AND TAPE RECORD EVERYTHING THE SALESPERSON TELLS YOU.

  9. johh peter says:

    I love this businees

  10. mercedes says:

    The return rate in 1990s is not bad

  11. Bill Moses says:

    There is no better way to invest over a long term than the stock market. I suggest no-load Vanguard index funds due to their solid performance and very low fees. They have several to choose from. You will probably need a thousand dollars to get started with them. Charles Schwab has no-load low fee index funds that you can open with as little as fifty (SWPPX), to one-hundred dollars. Then you need the confident approach of a turtle: easy, persistent, confident, rolling with the volatility and not panicking while gradually building wealth a basket at a time over a long haul, and out performing the rabbit minded investor. Remember: keep a steady, modest cutting expectation over a long haul.

  12. John Salisbury, Esq. says:

    No, timing is everything actually Beffett’s money was made in 1970s He got out of the Market completely in 1968 and closed his partnership because of high valuations not supported by anything – same thing in 2000, 2007,. Patience means nothing if you are 70 and not working. Sure, when you are young dollar cost works well, but we are not all the same age and cycle. Someday cash is king. COT.COM crash was like the Gold crash of 1976 everyone wanted in – that’s when to fear, when everyone wants out that’s when to buy. Schiller is right.

  13. Scott Sofonia says:

    Do not just buy and sell, wait for th be wave since you can sell then.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *